In a compelling employment dispute heard at the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC), long-serving accountant Siobhán McDonagh has alleged that she was “laughed at” by her employer when inquiring about her statutory redundancy lump sum payment after nearly 18 years of service. The case, brought under the Unfair Dismissals Act 1977 against James P McCann Ireland Ltd, a Dundalk-based arcade and bingo hall operator, highlights ongoing issues with redundancy processes and employee rights in Ireland.
Ms McDonagh, who earned over €50,000 annually as a financial controller, is seeking approximately €40,000 in compensation for alleged unfair dismissal. She claims there was no genuine redundancy situation, especially given statements from the businessman that the company was “flying” and profitable. This high-profile WRC hearing underscores the importance of fair redundancy procedures for employers and the protections available to employees facing job loss in 2025.
For those searching “redundancy disputes Ireland 2025” or “WRC unfair dismissal cases,” this article provides a detailed breakdown of the testimony, arguments from both sides, and broader implications for employment law.
Background: Siobhán McDonagh’s Nearly 18-Year Career with the McCann Family Businesses
Siobhán McDonagh began her employment in 2007 with Kimble Gaming Ltd, a company owned by Jim McCann specializing in arcade machines. Upon its closure in 2023, she transferred to James P McCann Ireland Ltd, continuing her role as financial controller. Over the years, the McCann family empire included up to 12 businesses, such as amusement arcades, private members’ clubs, a bingo hall in Dundalk, and manufacturing operations.
By 2025, however, the family retained only two arcades in Dublin, reportedly in “extreme financial difficulties.” Ms McDonagh’s redundancy in January 2025 came as a shock, particularly amid claims of the company’s strong performance.
This case exemplifies how long-term employees in family-run businesses, especially in the entertainment and gaming sector, can face sudden changes due to economic pressures or restructuring.
The Redundancy Dispute: ‘Laughed At’ and Told to Claim from the State
During the WRC hearing, Ms McDonagh recounted being informed of her redundancy and subsequently asking about her lump sum payment. She testified that her employer laughed and directed her to apply to the State’s Social Protection Fund instead. Despite eventually receiving the statutory redundancy from the fund, she maintained that the company was “doing well” and “flying,” making loads of money.
She questioned the need for liquidation given the alleged profitability and described the business as cash-heavy, with bank deposits not fully reflecting earnings. However, she admitted no longer having access to accounts and lacking concrete evidence beyond her observations during employment.
Adjudication officer Úna Glazier-Farmer probed for supporting evidence of the company’s strong performance, highlighting the challenges employees face in proving such claims post-dismissal.
- Claim Amount: Nearly €40,000 in compensation for unfair dismissal.
- Service Length: Nearly 18 years.
- Salary: Over €50,000 per year.
- Redundancy Payment Source: Received from Social Protection Fund, not employer.
Employer’s Defense: Financial Difficulties and Cost-Saving Outsourcing
Seoirse McCann, managing director and son of founder Jim McCann (who stepped back due to health issues), denied knowledge of his father’s alleged “flying” comments. He emphatically stated that both remaining companies were in “extreme financial difficulties.”
James P McCann Ireland Ltd functioned as a management company handling accounts, payroll, and maintenance for affiliated entities. Following the Dundalk bingo hall closure, it supported only two Dublin arcades (Clondalkin and Eden Quay via Starville Promotions Ltd).
With Ms McDonagh as the sole full-time office worker, outsourcing her role to an external accountant was projected to save around €30,000 annually—a “significant” reduction in costs.
Represented by Peter Dunlea of Peninsula Business Services, the employer argued the redundancy was genuine, though acknowledging procedural shortcomings common in small businesses.
Legal Arguments: Unfair Dismissal vs. Genuine Redundancy
Conor McCrave of Setanta Solicitors, representing Ms McDonagh, contended there was “no effort to engage” in a formal redundancy process, rendering the dismissal unfair. He emphasized the lack of consultation and questioned the genuineness of the redundancy.
The defense countered that while processes were “not the most robust,” case law allows leeway for small firms, and the selection was authentic given the business contraction.
This dispute raises key questions for “unfair dismissal redundancy Ireland” searches: When does cost-saving outsourcing constitute genuine redundancy, and what consultation is required under Irish employment law?
Broader Implications for Redundancy Rights and WRC Cases in Ireland 2025
The outcome of this WRC hearing could influence how employers handle redundancies in financially strained small businesses, particularly in sectors like gaming and entertainment affected by closures. It also reinforces employee rights to fair procedures under the Unfair Dismissals Act 1977 and Redundancy Payments Acts.
Employees facing similar situations should note the option to claim statutory redundancy from the State if employers refuse, followed by WRC complaints for unfair dismissal.
About the Author
